KALU KODE
Discuss a real problem

Selected conversations open

We are looking for real problems, not generic beta testers.

Kalu Kodeis opening a limited number of conversations with organizations that need to preserve a deployed application, recover authorized software, restore development memory, or evaluate a risky AI-driven refactor inside a clear scope.

Selected track
KodeCapture early access

Preserve the deployed truth before it changes.

A good fit may include:

  • a deployed web application that must be preserved before it changes or disappears
  • an interactive experience whose routes, assets, requests, storage, and runtime behavior matter
  • a modernization or recovery project that needs an evidence-grade starting point
  • clear ownership or explicit authorization to inspect the application
Continue to KodeCapture early access
Selected track
KodeBack recovery assessment

Buy clarity before committing to a recovery.

A good fit may include:

  • a deployed application whose usable source is missing or stale
  • a vendor or agency handoff that left production ahead of the repository
  • an acquisition with a functioning application but uncertain maintainability
  • a high-value interactive app whose behavior must survive modernization
Continue to KodeBack recovery assessment
Selected track
KodeAtlas context early access

Test whether evidence-backed history changes the agent’s plan.

A good fit may include:

  • a TypeScript/JavaScript repository with meaningful Git and GitHub history
  • engineering rationale distributed across PRs, issues, reviews, tests, and incidents
  • tasks that go stale when code moves or contracts change
  • agent workflows that need concise, cited context before editing
Continue to KodeAtlas context early access
Selected track
KodeProof private alpha

Evaluate one bounded, risky change honestly.

A good fit may include:

  • a JavaScript/TypeScript-family repository
  • a risky decomposition, module move, consolidation, hard cut, or public-contract refactor
  • an engineering owner who can define project gates and review the result
  • willingness to compare catches, false blocks, workflow cost, and independent task quality
Continue to KodeProof private alpha

What participation requires

Clear authorization and a named technical owner.

  • clear authorization;
  • a named technical champion;
  • bounded scope;
  • honest disclosure of constraints;
  • regular feedback;
  • acceptance that the correct result may be a refusal or recommendation not to proceed.

Participation does not require public reference permission, a polished innovation program, or pretending the product is more mature than it is.

General route

Tell us where the uncertainty is.

Use the general form for company, research, partnership, or routing questions. Do not send sensitive artifacts here.

General inquiry

Start with the problem

Please do not submit source archives, credentials, HAR files, private URLs, or confidential materials through this form.

Form endpoint not configured yet. Set PUBLIC_GENERAL_FORM_ENDPOINT before launch; this form will not send until then.

Take the next step

Not sure which track fits?

Explore the product line, then use the general route if the boundary crosses preservation, recovery, software memory, and controlled change.

Explore products Contact Kalu Kode